Prediction of Chris Lam vs Brad Lum-Tucker Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

C. Lam vs B. Lum-Tucker

Chris Lam
Chris Lam

Flag USA USA

w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
Brad Lum-Tucker
Brad Lum-Tucker

Flag USA USA

l
l
w
l
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

42
Age
43
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Lam 1 - 0 Lum-Tucker

They have played 2 sets in total, with Chris Lam winning 2 and Brad Lum-Tucker winning 0. The last match between Chris Lam and Brad Lum-Tucker was at the USA F29, 13-11-2006, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Chris Lam getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Lam1
Lum-Tucker0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1USA F29(11-13-06)

Hard
USA Flag
Chris Lam
6
6
USA Flag
Brad Lum-Tucker
1
3

C. Lam vs B. Lum-Tucker H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
45.83% (44-52)Career Total W/L16.67% (1-5)
1Hard0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

C. Lam vs B. Lum-Tucker Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chris Lam has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Brad Lum-Tucker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chris Lam, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Brad Lum-Tucker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Chris Lam has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brad Lum-Tucker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Chris Lam has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Brad Lum-Tucker winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Chris Lam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 34/38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Brad Lum-Tucker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 1/5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/5).
  • Player level: In the last year, Chris Lam has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Brad Lum-Tucker has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chris Lam winning 1 times and Brad Lum-Tucker being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chris Lam winning 2 and Brad Lum-Tucker winning 0.
  • The last match between Chris Lam and Brad Lum-Tucker was at the USA F29, 13-11-2006, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Chris Lam getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chris Lam has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Brad Lum-Tucker has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chris Lam has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brad Lum-Tucker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Chris Lam has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brad Lum-Tucker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Chris Lam vs Brad Lum-Tucker Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Lam vs B. Lum-Tucker H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won4
0:0:0Average Match Time0:0:0
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Lam 0%, Lum-Tucker 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Lam 0%, Lum-Tucker 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Lam 0%, Lum-Tucker 0%.

C. Lam Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardUSA F14 - 23-06-2008

R1

USAN. John
L
7-6(5) 6-2
ClayUSA F11 - 12-05-2008

R1

USAS. Bangoura
L
5-7 7-5 6-2
ClayUSA F10 - 05-05-2008

R1

USAA. El
L
6-3 6-1
ClayUSA F9 - 28-04-2008

R1

USAC. Buchanan
L
6-2 6-4
HardUSA F8 - 14-04-2008

R1

USAB. Wooten
L
6-2 6-4

B. Lum-Tucker Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardHilton Waikoloa Village USTA Challenger - Waikoloa - 21-01-2008

Q1

CZEL. Chramosta
L
6-3 6-3
HardUSA F29 - 12-11-2007

R1

GERA. Sr.
L
6-3 6-1
HardIndonesia F4 - 10-09-2007

R1

AUSM. Matosevic
L
6-2 1-6 6-1
HardHilton Waikoloa Village USTA Challenger - Waikoloa - 22-01-2007

Q2

USAT. Hahn
L
6-1 6-1

Q1

USAT. Aaron
W
6-4 6-7(6) 6-2
banner

C. Lam vs B. Lum-Tucker Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
45.83% (44/52)YTD Win/Loss16.67% (1/5)
46.85% (104/118)Sets Win/Loss21.43% (3/11)
49.60% (1042/1059)Games Win/Loss36.75% (43/74)
47.22% (34/38)Hard Win/Loss16.67% (1/5)
43.48% (10/13)Clay Win/Loss0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)Indoor Hard W/L0% (0/0)
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
432.24Average Opponent Rank166.5
0.00% (0/1)Main Tour W/L0% (0/0)
53.57% (15/13)Challenger W/L33.33% (1/2)
43.28% (29/38)Futures W/L0.00% (0/3)
46% (44/95)Best of 3 Sets Win %17% (1/6)
0% (0/1)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/0)
43% (13/30)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)0% (0/1)
52% (15/29)Deciding Set Win %50% (1/2)
80% (46/37)1st Set Won, Won Match100% (1/1)
20% (46/9)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (1/0)
16% (50/8)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (5/0)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Mon, 01 Dec, 08:00 AM
Prediction
INDD. Kodancha
INDC. Warik
W1
2.58
W2
1.43
Mon, 01 Dec, 07:00 AM
Prediction
INDD. Munim
INDA. Venkataraman
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
Sun, 30 Nov, 10:00 PM
Prediction
COLJ. S. Gomezq
COLN. Mejia2
W1
4.45
W2
1.159